Toban Black

 

 

June 20th, 2011

Tar sands undead walk


During a Car Free Festival in London, Ontario

Climate Justice London had a zombie walk with fake oil, for Stop Tar Sands Day.

The ‘oily’ zombies walked to raise awareness about the many impacts from tar sands operations — from Alberta, to Ontario, and beyond. This tar sands sludge is being pumped into Sarnia-Lambton’s Chemical Valley industries.  And, if the Enbridge Trailbreaker project proceeds, very dirty tar sands bitumen would be pumped through a pipeline which already crosses the Thames River, just north of London. In Alberta, toxic tailings ponds have been leaking into the Athabasca river, each and every day. The residents of the area also are threatened by pipeline spills. In one incident this spring, millions of litres of tar sands crude and diluent spilled into the territory of the Lubicon Cree.

Being car free helps us to be free from tar sands impacts.  In the meantime, we are becoming more and more dependent on dirtier and more expensive fossil fuel sources — including Alberta’s tar sands. Relative to conventional oil, tar sands crude has far more intense climate impacts, and the extraction of tar sands drains and pollutes immense amounts of fresh water.  There are many terrible impacts.

At the zombie walk, we used a “Turtle Island” tailings pond to catch our oily run-off, before and after the walk.

Across the street we taped up a banner that calls for a better world, where banks don’t invest in tar sands operations. We had this banner up in front of a TD – Canada Trust building.

In addition to photos in the set shown below, more photos from the zombie walk are posted here.





|   Comments (0)Categories: Centralization & homogenization · Ecology · Ecology: Energy and climate · Solidarity






June 4th, 2011

Don’t frack around southwestern Ontario


At the end of May, some of us gathered for a “Don’t frack with us!” protest in London, Ontario.

The rally call-out said -

Fracking is a toxic, dangerous, and wasteful form of natural gas extraction that we may see around London, Ontario. The water pollution is the worst of the fracking impacts. Tap water has become flammable after fracking is done to break gas out of nearby shale rock. A stew of toxic chemicals is pumped into each gas well, and radium is one of many underground substances that can be unintentionally released during this extraction.

In spite of all of those dangers, there are plans for shale gas exploration around London -
http://stopfrackingontario.wordpress.com/fracking/in-ontario/london/
In addition to water contamination, we also should be concerned about explosion risks, air pollution, water depletion, methane greenhouse gas releases, earthquakes, increased truck traffic, and deforestation.

If you are worried about all of these threats from fracking, please come out to this rally to show your concern, and learn more about what we are up against.

Two sets of photos from the protest can be seen here (on Facebook) and here (on Flickr).

This video shows some of the rally.

[Read more →]





|   Comments (1)Categories: Ecology · Ecology: Energy and climate · Local autonomy (constructive forms) · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalism · Solidarity






December 20th, 2009

The official Copenhagen talks: A fraudulent farce


BUSINESS AS U$UAL
(That image was cropped out of a photo taken by Jody B.)

——-

The COP15 talks in Copenhagen have been called “Brokenhagen” and “Failenhagen.” One write-up in The Guardian is titled “Low targets, goals dropped: Copenhagen ends in failure.”

Here is some selected material about the betrayals and the sell-outs in Copenhagen -

——-

Around the end of the talks

Civil society organization statements -
US undermines climate talks with bullying tactics and backroom deals
“Civil Society Denounces U.S. Plan for Fast-Tracking Warming, Worsening Humanitarian Crisis, and Fueling Ecological Collapse”

A statement from La Via Campesina -
Traders failed in Copenhagen. The future lies in people’s hands
(Although I support some of the groups and organizations who protested out there, I wouldn’t call the street demonstrations “power in Copenhagen.”)

A video -
Bill McKibben reacts to climate deal announcement at flash rally
“350.org founder and author, Bill McKibben offers his perspective of the end of the Copenhagen climate talks amidst a rousing rally to shame world leaders for not stepping up to the plate with a real deal.”

[Read more →]





|   Comments (2)Categories: Centralization & homogenization · Ecology: Energy and climate · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalism






December 11th, 2009

Mobility options and wider health issues


[In this post I am following up the previous one, which also was about health and mobility issues]

=======

At the Indie Media Fair
A patch that was made by Rachel, a local artist

A Streetfilms video -
Stop the pollution, pick a solution” (from July)

——-

“No Impact Man” makes some points that should be more obvious -

“If you walk instead of drive, you use more calories.

Walking and cycling is healthier for people than driving. Walking and cycling is also healthier for the planet than driving. Use cars less and you get to reduce global warming and be less fat. What an amazingly wonderful synergy.”

(Obviously he is referring to the Earth’s biosphere when he uses the word “planet.” The thing is, that “planet” language implies that people don’t live in the biosphere — which just isn’t the case.)

Critical mass bike rally sign
A sign that I used to display on my bike during critical mass rallies

[Read more →]





|   Comments (0)Categories: Ecology · Ecology: Energy and climate






October 26th, 2009

Confronting the BNP


Last week, Nick Griffin — the head of the racist and fascist ‘British National’ Party — was given some air time on BBC’s “Question Period.” There were protests, and a lot of controversy.
Here is some selected coverage and commentary -

“Lenin” on the Lenin’s Tomb blog -
Springboard for Griffin

An article on the BBC web site -
BNP support in poll sparks anger
(Anti-BNP bias actually isn’t a problem that anyone should complain about.)

Brian Wheeler on the BBC web site -
What did voters make of Griffin?
(I’m not exactly recommending that article. I’m just pointing it out because I think it captures how the BBC airtime has tended to feed into the BNP.)

[Read more →]





|   Comments (9)Categories: Political Economy · Solidarity






October 14th, 2009

Canadian tar


An informative video from the summer Climate Camp in England

=======

William Marsden (in this article) -

“Canadians increasingly live in a confusion of values. A 2008 survey by the Globe and Mail found that while 79 percent of respondents said the tar sands are good for Alberta and Canada, more than half of those respondents (55 percent) said that the sands were not good for the environment. The obvious contradiction can be justified only by minimizing or disconnecting oneself from the importance of [natural environments]. The problem is that global warming and the rapid dying out of species makes this level of self-deception increasingly dangerous.”

——-

Lisa Schmidt (in this article) -

“Canada –already the largest oil supplier to the U.S.–pumped out record exports south of the border this summer, as Alberta’s oilsands crude fill the gaps left by competitors.

U.S. imports of crude oil from Canada rose 5.4 per cent in July to the highest monthly level in at least 36 years, according to figures released by the U.S. Energy Department.”

“Canada is the largest exporter of crude oil to the U.S. and has increased the amount it ships as OPEC countries have cut back.

[Read more →]





|   Comments (1)Categories: Centralization & homogenization · Ecology: Energy and climate · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalism · Solidarity






October 11th, 2009

Anti-ecological militarism


Steven Freeland (in this article) -

“[Throughout human history there have been] many deliberate acts to destroy or exploit the natural environment to achieve military goals. In the 5th century BC the retreating Scythians poisoned the water wells in an effort to slow the advancing Persian army. Roman troops razed the city of Carthage in 146 BC and poisoned the surrounding soil with salt to prevent its future cultivation. The American Civil War saw the widespread implementation of ‘scorched earth’ policies.

In August 1945 the United States detonated atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in massive loss of life and environmental destruction. During the Vietnam War, the US implemented Operation Ranch Hand, to devastating effect, to destroy vegetation used by its enemy for cover and sustenance, using chemicals such as Agent Orange.

More recently still, who can forget the haunting images of more than 700 burning Kuwaiti oil well-heads which had been deliberately ignited by retreating Iraqi forces during the Gulf War in 1991 a scene that was likened to Dante’s Inferno. Over the following 10 years the Saddam regime built barriers and levees to drain the al-Hawizeh and al-Hammar marshes in southern Iraq.” “This effectively destroyed the livelihood of the 500,000 Marsh Arabs who had inhabited this unique ecosystem.

Acts of significant and deliberate environmental destruction, exploitation and contamination during armed conflict have continued in more recent times, including the use of cluster bombs and weapons containing depleted uranium by US and British forces in Iraq.

[Read more →]





|   Comments (0)Categories: Centralization & homogenization · Ecology · Ecology: Energy and climate · Political Economy






October 9th, 2009

Mobilizing for Climate Justice


A post that I put together for the Waging Nonviolence web site -
An invitation from the Mobilization for Climate Justice coalition

This post introduces the U.S.-based Mobilization for Climate Justice, as well as similar critiques and activism associated with that Climate Justice coalition. As I indicate, the organizers in and around that coalition also address a range of energy & carbon issues (including tar sands pollution, and biofuel land grabs) — along with interrelated and more apparent global warming concerns. Their approach to these ecological issues is based on prior environmental justice critiques and activism, as well as wider opposition towards corporations, and other international market structures.

Climate Justice Action is another “climate justice” coalition. They seem to be a lot more connected with countries outside of North America — whereas The Mobilization for Climate Justice is very U.S.-based.

The phrase “climate justice” also is used by various other people — some of whom probably wouldn’t know anything about Climate Justice Action or the Mobilization for Climate Justice. The concept of climate justice was around for years before those two coalitions were formed, so the phrase has wider traction. Of course, the actual uses of that term are somewhat inconsistent; there is no absolute consensus about what ‘climate justice’ is.





|   Comments (0)Categories: Ecology · Ecology: Energy and climate · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalism · Solidarity






October 6th, 2009

Ongoing greenwashing


[In this post I basically am following up another one titled "Waves of greenwash"]

"Body Shop" marketing
Body Shop marketing in a mall

Shop for The Earth!
Buy from the Planetary Guardians!

——-

Exerpts from an article by Stan Cox in CounterPunch -
The Political Economics of Greenwashing: Green as a Blackjack Table” (in 2008)

“In their desperation to keep the American economy afloat, government and business will be tossing overboard any proposals for real environmental protection. No time for such romantic foolishness when there are investments to be protected.”

“Not that we won’t be hearing about the environment; indeed, the next [commercial expansion] spurt, if it comes, is likely to be clothed in a green as green as the felt on a blackjack table.”

“For more than 30 years, The Body Shop and its CEO, self-styled anti-capitalist capitalist Anita Roddick, avidly cultivated a corporate image as pioneers of high business ethics. But The Body Shop has been dismissed by critics as no more than a world leader in pale-green consumerism.”

[Read more →]





|   Comments (2)Categories: Centralization & homogenization · Ecology · Ecology: Energy and climate · Political economy: Capitalism






September 26th, 2009

Switch Off Hazelwood actions against coal in Australia


In this post, I’ll be sharing photos, videos, and a write-up about Switch Off Hazelwood anti-coal campaign rallies and interventions in Australia, earlier in September. I also will be offering a little commentary.

(This post isn’t about breaking news. But I happen to think that we should remember and continue to talk about previous actions — well after a couple of weeks have passed.)


“COMMUNITY DECOMMISSION ORDER”

(Like the other images in this post, that photo is from the “hazelwood2009″ pages on Flickr — where you can see a lot of other photos.)

A campaign video -
Switch off Hazelwood – Coal Fired Power Station Action

That video is an introduction to the overall campaign — in relation to a wider movement against fossil fuel consumption (which activists are just beginning to bring together — in Australia, and elsewhere). The video calls for proactive activist responses to mounting global warming threats — above all.

[Read more →]





|   Comments (1)Categories: Ecology: Energy and climate · Political Economy · Solidarity