
(By “Mr. Lunch Breath“)
=======
Similar greenwash techniques also are used in other marketing and PR spin.
Here’s one example -
[Read more →]

(By “Mr. Lunch Breath“)
=======
Similar greenwash techniques also are used in other marketing and PR spin.
Here’s one example -
[Read more →]
| Comments (2)Categories: Ecology · Political economy: Capitalist commerce

(A Grist photo)
=======
UK Climate Campers have said this on Twitter (in their “bio” statement) -
“It’s time to show our ‘leaders’ how we’re going to take action to reduce emissions ourselves. Because it’s business as usual at Copenhagen.”
——-
Cascadia Brian (of Rising Tide North America)
on the It’s Getting Hot in Here blog -
“Copenhagen and the end of naïveté”
A post from “tanuki” (of Rising Tide North America, and other networks)
on the It’s Getting Hot in Here blog -
“Out of the frying pan and into the streets!, or ‘How I stopped lobbying and put up my dukes!‘”
(I’m not re-posting that link to reject any and all lobbying — particularly at the municipal level, where lobbying impacts are more feasible.)
——-
[These words are from a comment that I posted on the second of those blog posts; I then edited and elaborated on this text, before re-posting it here and now.]
Common people are going to have to sort these problems out;
and to accomplish that, we’re going to have to rise up — to take power.
We need to collectively re-make this world; and to do that, we’ll need to motivate and mobilize a lot more people — including ourselves, in some cases.
What are we waiting for? Let’s do this.
A lot more of us will have to be a lot more engaged in making this change happen.
Obama is not a radical superhero; and no one else out there is either. There are no hero-saviours out there who are going to turn around these crises on, their own.
Join us in the climate justice movement
AND/OR
Join us in the pursuit of practical, community-level solutions.
[Read more →]
| Comments (1)Categories: Ecology: Energy and carbon · Local autonomy (certain forms of) · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalist commerce · Solidarity

(That image was cropped out of a photo taken by Jody B.)
——-
The COP15 talks in Copenhagen have been called “Brokenhagen” and “Failenhagen.” One write-up in The Guardian is titled “Low targets, goals dropped: Copenhagen ends in failure.”
Here is some selected material about the betrayals and the sell-outs in Copenhagen -
——-
Around the end of the talks
Civil society organization statements -
“US undermines climate talks with bullying tactics and backroom deals”
“Civil Society Denounces U.S. Plan for Fast-Tracking Warming, Worsening Humanitarian Crisis, and Fueling Ecological Collapse”
A statement from La Via Campesina -
“Traders failed in Copenhagen. The future lies in people’s hands”
(Although I support some of the groups and organizations who protested out there, I wouldn’t call the street demonstrations “power in Copenhagen.”)
A video -
“Bill McKibben reacts to climate deal announcement at flash rally”
“350.org founder and author, Bill McKibben offers his perspective of the end of the Copenhagen climate talks amidst a rousing rally to shame world leaders for not stepping up to the plate with a real deal.”
[Read more →]
| Comments (1)Categories: Ecology: Energy and carbon · Globalizing (certain forms of) · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalist commerce
[In this post I am following up the previous one, which also was about health and mobility issues]
=======

A patch that was made by Rachel, a local artist
—
A Streetfilms video -
“Stop the pollution, pick a solution” (from July)
——-
“No Impact Man” makes some points that should be more obvious -
“If you walk instead of drive, you use more calories.
Walking and cycling is healthier for people than driving. Walking and cycling is also healthier for the planet than driving. Use cars less and you get to reduce global warming and be less fat. What an amazingly wonderful synergy.”
(Obviously he is referring to the Earth’s biosphere when he uses the word “planet.” The thing is, that “planet” language implies that people don’t live in the biosphere — which just isn’t the case.)
—

A sign that I used to display on my bike during critical mass rallies
[Read more →]
| Comments (0)Categories: Ecology · Ecology: Energy and carbon

A lone cyclist — surrounded by automobiles
in London, Ontario, Canada
=======
As I noted in a previous post, our streets are battlegrounds. The automobile drivers definitely have the upper-hand in these battles -
A post on the Baltimore Spokes site -
“Half of traffic fatalities are not in cars (in June)
Elana Schor on the Streetsblog New York City site -
“WHO report highlights global health risk of traffic” (in June)
[Read more →]
| Comments (1)Categories: Globalizing (certain forms of) · Liberal individualism
| Comments (1)Categories: Liberal individualism · Political economy: Capitalist commerce
A car advertisement on the back of a local bus
—
Andy Rowell on the Oil Change blog -
“Electric Vehicles May Increase CO2”
(I think it’s too much of a stretch to say that electric vehicles are “all the rage”; but some people definitely are looking toward them as ’solutions.’)
Brad Aaron on the Streetsblog New York City site -
“Do Your Part: Buy an Audi, Drive Fast” (in October)
(Evidently the author is using the word “transit” to refer to mass transit — such as buses.)
Fred Pearce in The Guardian -
“BMW’s ActiveHybrid X6 Accelerates Nonsense About High-performance, Low-emission Cars” (in September)
Brad Aaron on the Streetsblog New York City site -
“Ad Nauseam: Toyota’s (Passive-Aggressive) Ransom Note to America” (in October)
—
Here are some related posts on this blog -
http://tobanblack.net/blog/?tag=automobiles
| Comments (0)Categories: Ecology: Energy and carbon · Liberal individualism · Political economy: Capitalist commerce
Andy Rowell on the Oil Change blog -
“Big Oil Front Group Fights for Tar Sands” (in October)
Leo Hickman in The Guardian -
“CO2 is Green: The TV Advert Making Viewers Choke” (in September)
Anya Kamenetz on a Fast Company site -
“Head in the Tar Sands? The New York Times Runs Anti-Peak Oil Op-Ed” (in August)
—
Coal industry PR
Amanda Terkel on Think Progress -
“‘Let’s Learn About Coal’: Industry Front Group Distributes Coloring Book On The ‘Advantages’ Of Coal”
Amanda Terkel on Think Progress -
“University Of Kentucky Approves New $7 Million Industry-Funded Dorm Named After ‘Coal’” (in late October)
“Sparki” on The Understory blog -
“The Real FACES of Environmental Extremism” (in October)
| Comments (0)Categories: Ecology: Energy and carbon · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalist commerce
Last week, Nick Griffin — the head of the racist and fascist ‘British National’ Party — was given some air time on BBC’s “Question Period.” There were protests, and a lot of controversy.
Here is some selected coverage and commentary -
“Lenin” on the Lenin’s Tomb blog -
“Springboard for Griffin”
An article on the BBC web site -
“BNP support in poll sparks anger”
(Anti-BNP bias actually isn’t a problem that anyone should complain about.)
Brian Wheeler on the BBC web site -
“What did voters make of Griffin?”
(I’m not exactly recommending that article. I’m just pointing it out because I think it captures how the BBC airtime has tended to feed into the BNP.)
[Read more →]
| Comments (8)Categories: Political Economy · Solidarity
A video recording of the leader of the party describing his marketing strategy for the BNP -
“BNP Griffin tells truth!“ [via the-sauce]
Brendan Montague on his site (the-sauce.org) -
“BNP = NF + €”

(Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons are in that photo)
.
Inayat Bunglawala in The Guardian -
“Protect our mosques from the far right” (in June)
Dan Evans in News of the World -
“Angel-faced racist aged 12: Girl burns golly at BNP fun day” (in August)
(I mainly am posting that link to highlight the “Golly”-burning.)
[Read more →]
| Comments (1)Categories: Political Economy