Toban Black

 

 

July 1st, 2009

Questioning car culture


Ian Sacs (in this blog post) -

“Drivers are confused, at best, with bicyclists on ‘their’ streets (angry at their interference, at worst), and bicyclists are summarily fearful of drivers.”

“Status-quo … design is not going to get more bikes on the road than there are brave messenger jobs and aggressive enthusiasts. The average person is just not that daring. After decades of our industry designing roadways for the [most] efficient throughput of cars, bicycling has been all but marginalized.”

Road infrastructure and automobiles

Brad Aaron on the New York Streetsblog -
Is death an appropriate penalty for ‘jaywalking’?” (May 19th)

John Bennett on the Sustainable Savannah blog -
Calling crashes ‘accidents,’ even when they aren’t” (March 31st)

David Chernushenko (in this blog post) -

“In every city there are thousands of closet cyclists, people who would love to ride their bikes but don’t dare. They see cycling in the city as something for bike couriers, for the fiendishly fit, for neighbours with nerves of steel.”

Our cities are just bursting with pedaling potential, and it’s time to set it loose on the streets.”

(I have posted another exerpt from that blog post here.)

[Read more →]





|   Comments (0)Categories: Liberal individualism · Local autonomy (certain forms of) · Political Economy






July 1st, 2009

American gun culture



(Photo by “dno1967“)

In a grocery store in Florida

——–

Marie Cocco at TruthDig.com -
Guns and the Link We Won’t Admit (June 15th)

——–


(Photo by Willie Stark)

In Las Vegas — where this billboard also is or was on display to promote The Gun Store

——–

Gwen on the Sociological Images blog -
Increase in Gun Sales

(Comments 4 through 6 were posted by me.
Later I was planning to follow those statements up to respond to at least one of the other subsequent comments, but I didn’t get around to doing that.)

[Read more →]





|   Comments (0)Categories: Liberal individualism · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalist commerce






July 1st, 2009

Occupied territories - Part 2


"FREE GAZA"
(Here in London, Ontario, Canada)

“FREE GAZA”

—–

Who Profits from the Occupation?

“Israeli and international corporations are directly involved in the occupation: in the construction of Israeli colonies and infrastructure in the occupied territories, in the settlements’ economy, in building walls and checkpoints, in the supply of specific equipment used in the control and repression of the civilian population under occupation.”

“Currently, we focus our attention on three main areas of corporate involvement in the occupation: The Settlement Industry, Economic Exploitation and Control of Population. At this stage in our project, we are not investigating the vast industry of military production and arms trade. The information we provide on the exploitation of Palestinian labor and production is also very limited.”

—–

Those images are small thumbnails from a set of photos from Israel that Alex Segre has posted on Flickr.

[Read more →]





|   Comments (0)Categories: Globalizing (certain forms of) · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalist commerce · Solidarity






July 1st, 2009

Occupied territories - Part 1


Bryan Farrell on the Waging Nonviolence blog -
Nonviolence goes overlooked in Palestine

“joy_in_palestine” on their In Palestine blog-
[ Nonviolent Palestinian resistance ]

Gwen on the Sociological Images blog -
‘1 SHOT, 2 KILLS’ [Israeli] army t-shirts” (March 24th)

Jerrold Kessel and Pierre Klochendler (in this article) -

A recent “Human Rights Watch (HRW) report focuses on six cases of Israeli drone-launched missile attacks in which 29 Palestinian civilians, eight of them children, were killed. Based on cross-referenced eyewitness accounts corroborated by doctors, as well as ballistics and forensic evidence collected on the attack sites, the report asserts that ‘in none of the cases did HRW find evidence that Palestinian fighters were present in the immediate area of the attack at the time.’ ”

“Marc Garlasco, senior military analyst at the emergencies program of HRW, estimates that at least 87 civilians were killed in 42 drone attacks.”

“Israel is the world leader in drone technology.”

“Israeli drones have advanced sensors, combining radars, electro- optical and infrared cameras, and lasers providing real time imaging by day and night.”

“According to Palestinian sources, 900 civilians were killed during the military operations, among a total of more than 1,400 killed. The HRW report says a third of the fatalities were from drone-launched missiles. Israeli sources put the civilian death toll at 300.”


(Photo by “TLV REVOLTER“)

In Israel

[Read more →]





|   Comments (0)Categories: Ecology · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalist commerce · Solidarity






June 26th, 2009

Oil companies in Nigeria


Andy Rowell on the Oil Change blog -
Shell’s Secret Collusion Documents” (June 15th)

That post is an overview of issues around the recent Shell trial.

Andy Rowell also has published these blog entries about conflicts between oil companies and Nigerians -
- “Justice Begins at Home” (November, 2008)
- “13 Years On and Death Still Stalks the Niger Delta” (November, 2008)
- “Welcome to the ‘Oil War’” (September, 2008)

(Those are three blog posts that I have actually read. At the time, I had decided that I would recommend those posts.)





|   Comments (0)Categories: Ecology: Energy and carbon · Globalizing (certain forms of) · Political economy: Capitalist commerce






June 26th, 2009

Airplane economics and airplane ecology


The David Suzuki Foundation (on this page) -

“Although aviation is a relatively small industry, it has a disproportionately large impact on the climate system. It presently accounts for [approximately] 4-9% of the total climate change impact of human activity.”

“A special characteristic of aircraft emissions is that most of them are produced at cruising altitudes high in the atmosphere. Scientific studies have shown that these high-altitude emissions have a more harmful climate impact.”

Contrails, “the long plumes of exhaust that can be seen in the sky behind airplanes,” “trap heat that would otherwise escape from the earth, which contributes to global warming.”

“Right now there is no climate-friendly alternative to the kerosene fuel burned by airplanes, and there is no indication that solar or hydrogen-powered aircraft can be expected anytime soon. In terms of efficiency, it appears that improvements in current aircraft technology have nearly reached their limit.”

(There is additional information about these global warming impacts on that page.)

Richard Heinberg on societal changes that he foresees in upcoming decades -

“Today businesspeople and middle-class vacationers regard air travel as a normal and affordable, if increasingly tedious, option for getting from anywhere to anywhere else in a few hours. But as fuel becomes scarce and costly, airlines will go bankrupt and consolidate; most planes will be grounded and mothballed; routes will be cut. Small cities will lose commercial service altogether. Whole terminals at larger airports will be closed permanently.

Air service will continue to connect large cities, but flights will be fewer and slower (speed reduces fuel efficiency), with every seat filled. And those flights will be much more expensive.

In short, we will be returning to the days of the Jet Set, when only the wealthy flew. People were simply less mobile in the 1950s than they are today. And the future will likewise be characterized by declining mobility. The implications are far-reaching and take a while to appreciate. Think of the impacts to tourism, (including all its subsidiary components such as the hotel industry and the car rental companies), universities, far-flung families, the entertainment industry, scientific research. . . . ”

(Those remarks are linked to the more in-depth energy analysis in Mr. Heinberg’s books.)

[Read more →]





|   Comments (0)Categories: Ecology · Ecology: Energy and carbon · Globalizing (certain forms of) · Liberal individualism · Political economy: Capitalist commerce






June 26th, 2009

Automobiles and fossil fuels


Another roadscape

—–

On cars as we know them -

Asher Miller (in this blog post) -
“Only about 15% of the energy that goes into your gas tank is used to move your car. And, because of the weight of an average car, only about 1% is actually used to move you.”

Alec Dubro (in this article) -

“The average car or light truck is two tons or so: 4000-plus pounds to move 200 pounds of people. OK, everybody out of the SUVs and F-150s and into a nice, green Prius. However, the curb weight of an unladen Prius is 2765 pounds, which means a ton and a half around to get you and a bag of groceries home. Not good.”

“Even if we were able to produce a … zero pollution vehicle, we’d still need to maintain the infrastructure of roads, bridges, and energy distribution. That means steel, concrete, asphalt and plastics. Just concrete production alone generates as much as 10 percent of all greenhouse gas. In 2007, the U.S. produced 95 million tons of cement by burning fossil fuels and, according to the EPA, is the third largest source of greenhouse gas pollution in the U.S. (Scientific America, August 7, 2008) The production of asphalt – a petroleum product – also creates carbon. As does the production of motor oil, tires, and on and on.”

And there’s another intractable problem: the very thing that makes tires so useful – comfort, stability, adhesion – also produces immense rolling friction. In order for us to makes cars that are maneuverable and relatively safe, they have to grip the road, which takes buckets of energy to overcome. One reason trains are able to transport people using far less energy per passenger mile is that there are fewer wheels per person and steel wheels have much less rolling friction.”

—–


(Photo by Berd)

[Read more →]





|   Comments (1)Categories: Ecology · Ecology: Energy and carbon · Political Economy · Political economy: Capitalist commerce






June 25th, 2009

Everyday bicycling



(Photo by Matthew Blackett)

—–

David Chernushenko’s perspective on two European cities (specifically, Stockholm — “a northern city that has plenty of ups and downs, and cold”; and Freiburg — a city “bordering on Germany’s Black Forest mountains”) -

“What strikes the Canadian visitor is just how ordinary cycling seems to be in the lives of the locals. It is not a big deal to choose to ride somewhere. It does not involve special clothes, helmets, gloves and fancy bikes. Herds of children roll by on their way to school together. Couples head off to work. An older lady rides by with a load of groceries in the rear panniers, and a lapdog in the front basket.”

—–

Matthew Blackett on the Spacing Toronto blog -
Bike traffic in Copenhagen

A stop-action animation which Matthew made out of a collection of photos.

Andreas Rohl (quoted in this article) -
“Riding a bike is like brushing your teeth in Copenhagen. It’s just a part of our everyday life”

Aaron Naparstek (in this blog post) -

“In Copenhagen I saw people using cargo bikes to cart their kids all over the place. I rarely saw an adult wearing a helmet. It made an impression on me. This lack of protective headgear — or any special bike gear, for that matter — is one of the things that, to my eye, made biking in Copenhagen seem so remarkably convenient, casual, safe and part of regular daily life. It didn’t matter what you’re wearing. In Copenhagen you just hop on a bike and go.

The sheer sense of normalcy conveyed by streets filled with helmetless, kid-toting Danish cyclists seemed to me to do more to encourage bicycling and promote safety than any personal equipment or piece of infrastructure I’d ever seen back home. And the numbers back that up. Somehow, despite the lack of headgear, Danish, German and Dutch cyclist injury and fatality rates are a fraction of our own [in New York].

We know from the work of Peter Jacobsen that one of the most surefire ways to make urban bike transportation safer is to increase the number of cyclists on city streets. There are a lot of proven and effective ways to encourage more people to get on bikes. Compelling everyone to strap a styrofoam shell to their head is not one of them — at least not in the world cities with the safest streets for cyclists.”

[Read more →]





|   Comments (1)Categories: Local autonomy (certain forms of)






June 25th, 2009

Fallen fruit


A manifesto -

A SPECTER is haunting our cities: barren landscapes with foliage and flowers, but nothing to eat. Fruit can grow almost anywhere, and can be harvested by everyone. Our cities are planted with frivolous and ugly landscaping, sad shrubs and neglected trees, whereas they should burst with ripe produce. Great sums of money are spent on young trees, water and maintenance. While these trees are beautiful, they could be healthy, fruitful and beautiful.

WE ASK all of you to petition your cities and towns to support community gardens and only plant fruit-bearing trees in public parks. Let our streets be lined with apples and pears! Demand that all parking lots be landscaped with fruit trees which provide shade, clean the air and feed the people.

FALLEN FRUIT is a mapping and manifesto for all the free fruit we can find. Every day there is food somewhere going to waste. We encourage you to find it, tend and harvest it. If you own property, plant food on your perimeter. Share with the world and the world will share with you. Barter, don’t buy! Give things away! You have nothing to lose but your hunger!





|   Comments (0)Categories: Local autonomy (certain forms of) · Political Economy · Solidarity






June 24th, 2009

“Permablitzing” — An overview



Eat the Suburbs: Gardening for the End of the Oil Age

(A higher quality version of that video also is available — here.)

——

Permablitz Defined

A brief overview

Basically, permablitzes are community landscaping events, during which land is re-worked based on permaculture principles.  Permablitzers generally have been re-working others’ private property (e.g. their backyards) during these events
(so far, at least).

——

Adam Grubb (in this blog post) -

“For those who haven’t been to one, a permablitz is a kind of one day permaculture-styled backyard (or frontyard) makeover, with free workshops, fun and food — all based on volunteerism and a model of reciprocity. Anyone can come, and for many it’s their first experience with permaculture design or food gardening. If you come to three or so, we can help organise one at your house.”

“They can be fantastically good days helping people on the road to some serious food production, and some beautiful gardens can result.

“The permablitz concept started here in Melbourne in 2006 through a collaboration between permaculture student/teacher Dan Palmer and a South American community group in Melbourne’s outer eastern suburbs. I was lucky enough to be involved in the first one thanks to my friendship with Dan. Since, we’ve blitzed all around the city, with renters, in housing estates, on big properties, on tiny ones, in community gardens and schools”

“Nobody funds us — so far our efforts organising and administering blitzes (except working with the Dandenong Development Board, and running courses) have been entirely voluntary. There’s an evolving loose knit crew of people who chip in. We’re looking at incorporating as a non-profit soon though so some of this will be a bit more formalised soon.”

“Blitzes have been happening or groups are forming in Alice Springs, Bega, Bundaberg, Sydney and elsewhere.”

“We’d like to see more local blitz groups form, so the concept can spread nodally. The command and control alternative sounds like too much work anyway”

“We’ve got a short manual for people wanting to organise blitzes elsewhere. Email us permablitz@gmail.com if you’d like a copy.”

There also are some before & after photos that blog post quoted above.

[Read more →]





|   Comments (0)Categories: Ecology · Ecology: Energy and carbon · Local autonomy (certain forms of) · Solidarity